GRID K280Q vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K280Q and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K280Q stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
GRID K280Q
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
GRID K280Q | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2070 has 5% more power consumption, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K280Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 171 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 2012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 41% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 31% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GRID K280Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K280Q | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK104 | GF100 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.0 | 2.0 |