GRID M6 8Q vs Tesla C2070
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M6 8Q and Tesla C2070. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Tesla C2070. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M6 8Q
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2070 has 138% more power consumption, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 2 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 148 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 2024 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M6 8Q and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 6% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
GRID M6 8Q and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GRID M6 8Q and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
Code name | GM204 | GF100 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.2 | 2.0 |