HD Graphics 5000 vs Tesla C2070
When comparing HD Graphics 5000 and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between HD Graphics 5000 and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
HD Graphics 5000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5000 here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics 5000 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 693% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5000.
- HD Graphics 5000 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 5000 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 5000 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 374 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5000.
- HD Graphics 5000 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 640% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 140% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 233% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 540% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 2000% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 966% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1300% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 82% more, than HD Graphics 5000. |
Full Specs
HD Graphics 5000 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Fermi |
Code name | Haswell GT3 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 40 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |