HD Graphics 6000 vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between HD Graphics 6000 and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the HD Graphics 6000 stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
HD Graphics 6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 6000 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 6000 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 1486% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 6000.
- HD Graphics 6000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 6000 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 6000 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 274 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 6000.
- HD Graphics 6000 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 350% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 640% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| HD Graphics 6000 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 133% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 233% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 206% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 966% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than HD Graphics 6000. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 6000 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Fermi |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |