Iris Graphics 6100 vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 6100 and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 6100 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 1486% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 214% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 145% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Fermi |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |