Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 650 stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 1486% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 26 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 49% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 74% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 116% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 86% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Fermi |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650
- Tesla C2070 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost