Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 1486% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 38% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 214% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 145% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Fermi |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 June 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Tesla C2070 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Tesla C2070 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost