Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Tesla C2070

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Check Price

Tesla C2070

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Laptops

Main Specs

	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Tesla C2070
Power consumption (TDP)		238 Watt
Interface		PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 8-pin
Memory type		GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount		6 GB
Display Connectors		1x DVI
	Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 174 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	9−10
QHD / 1440p	8−9	3−4
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	27−30	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	35−40	27−30
ultra / 1080p	30−35	21−24
QHD / 1440p	14−16	6−7
4K / 2160p	9−10	5−6
low / 720p	70−75	55−60
medium / 1080p	40−45	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	210−220
medium / 768p	200−210	180−190
ultra / 1080p	120−130	100−110
QHD / 1440p	100−110	60−65
4K / 2160p	55−60	30−35
high / 768p	170−180	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	55−60	40−45
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	85−90	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	27−30	20−22
ultra / 1080p	24−27	18−20
QHD / 1440p	20−22	18−20
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
low / 720p	55−60	40−45
medium / 1080p	30−33	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	35−40	27−30
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	130−140	100−110
medium / 1080p	75−80	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 28% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	35−40	27−30
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	10−11
4K / 2160p	14−16	−
low / 720p	75−80	55−60
medium / 1080p	40−45	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	110−120	90−95
medium / 768p	95−100	80−85
high / 1080p	45−50	30−35
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
QHD / 1440p	9−10	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	14−16	10−11
ultra / 1080p	10−12	8−9
QHD / 1440p	10−12	−
4K / 2160p	3−4	1−2
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	20−22	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 38% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2070.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	75−80	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	16−18	12−14
ultra / 1080p	10−12	9−10
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	21−24	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	80−85	60−65
medium / 768p	50−55	35−40
high / 1080p	27−30	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
4K / 2160p	9−10	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 35% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2070.

Full Specs

	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Tesla C2070
Architecture	Gen. 11 Ice Lake	Fermi
Code name	Tiger Lake Xe	GF100
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	15 August 2020	25 July 2011
Pipelines	96	448
Core clock speed	400 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1350 MHz
Transistor count		3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate		32.14
Floating-point performance		1,030.4 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width		384 Bit
Memory clock speed		2988 MHz
Memory bandwidth		143.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+
DirectX	DirectX 12_1	12 (11_0)
Shader Model		5.1
OpenGL		4.6
OpenCL		1.1
Vulkan		N/A
CUDA		2.0
Quick Sync	+
	Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Tesla C2070

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares