P106 100 vs Tesla C2070

In this comparison between P106 100 and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P106 100 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

P106 100

Tesla C2070

Main Specs

	P106 100	Tesla C2070
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI

Tesla C2070 has 98% more power consumption, than P106 100.
P106 100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
P106 100 and Tesla C2070 have maximum RAM of 6 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
P106 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of P106 100 is 932 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
P106 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
P106 100 is 2 mm longer, than Tesla C2070.
Memory clock speed of P106 100 is 5020 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	16−18
ultra / 1080p	21−24	9−10
QHD / 1440p	16−18	3−4
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	30−35
medium / 1080p	40−45	21−24
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	55−60	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	35−40	6−7
4K / 2160p	18−20	5−6
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	60−65	30−33
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
P106 100 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	210−220
medium / 768p	220−230	180−190
ultra / 1080p	180−190	100−110
QHD / 1440p	110−120	60−65
4K / 2160p	70−75	30−35
high / 768p	210−220	150−160
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	40−45
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
P106 100 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	45−50	20−22
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
QHD / 1440p	27−30	18−20
4K / 2160p	14−16	6−7
low / 720p	80−85	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	21−24
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	27−30	12−14
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	100−110
medium / 1080p	110−120	60−65
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	30−35	10−11
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	65−70	30−35
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	140−150	90−95
medium / 768p	120−130	80−85
high / 1080p	70−75	30−35
ultra / 1080p	30−35	12−14
QHD / 1440p	21−24	3−4
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−11
ultra / 1080p	20−22	8−9
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	30−35
medium / 1080p	30−35	14−16
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	130−140	110−120
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2070.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	16−18	9−10
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	30−35
medium / 1080p	35−40	16−18
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	130−140	60−65
medium / 768p	85−90	35−40
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	24−27	12−14
4K / 2160p	16−18	6−7
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2070.

Full Specs

	P106 100	Tesla C2070
Architecture	Pascal	Fermi
Code name	GP106	GF100
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	19 June 2017	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1280	448
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1709 MHz
Transistor count	4,400 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	136.7	32.14
Floating-point performance	4,375 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	250 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	192 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	8008 MHz	2988 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	143.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	6.1	2.0

P106 100 vs Tesla C2070

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares