Quadro 2000 vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between Quadro 2000 and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
Quadro 2000
Tesla C2070
Power consumption (TDP)
62 Watt
238 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2070 has 283% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2070 has 5 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro 2000 and Tesla C2070 are build with Fermi architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro 2000 is 51 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Quadro 2000 and Tesla C2070 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2070 is 70 mm longer, than Quadro 2000.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 388 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
10−12
30−35
medium / 1080p
2−3
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 380% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
3−4
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
55−60
medium / 1080p
4−5
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 428% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro 2000 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
210−220
medium / 768p
85−90
180−190
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
QHD / 1440p
−
60−65
4K / 2160p
10−11
30−35
high / 768p
60−65
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 122% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
18−20
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 110% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
2−3
20−22
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
10−11
40−45
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
12−14
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
8−9
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 233% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
3−4
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
55−60
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 387% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
40−45
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
3−4
30−35
ultra / 1080p
2−3
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−11
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
3−4
30−35
medium / 1080p
2−3
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 850% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
55−60
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
8−9
60−65
medium / 768p
7−8
35−40
high / 1080p
3−4
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro 2000.
Full Specs
Quadro 2000
Tesla C2070
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi
Code name
GF106
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
24 December 2010
25 July 2011
Pipelines
192
448
Core clock speed
625 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
20.00
32.14
Floating-point performance
480.0 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
178 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
2600 MHz
2988 MHz
Memory bandwidth
41.6 GB/s
143.4 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.1
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
31 Mh/s
Check Price
