Quadro 2000M vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Quadro 2000M and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000M and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 332% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 2000M and Tesla C2070 are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 24 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M and Tesla C2070 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 2088 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro 2000M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 489% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Quadro 2000M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 377% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | Fermi | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |