Quadro 6000 vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between Quadro 6000 and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 6000 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
Quadro 6000
Tesla C2070
Power consumption (TDP)
204 Watt
238 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2070 has 16% more power consumption, than Quadro 6000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro 6000 and Tesla C2070 have maximum RAM of 6 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro 6000 and Tesla C2070 are build with Fermi architecture.
Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
Quadro 6000 and Tesla C2070 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Both graphics cards are the same length of 248 mm.
Memory clock speed of Quadro 6000 and Tesla C2070 is 2988 MHz.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
3−4
3−4
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 21% more, than Quadro 6000.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
6−7
6−7
4K / 2160p
5−6
5−6
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 19% more, than Quadro 6000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 6000.
low / 768p
200−210
210−220
medium / 768p
170−180
180−190
ultra / 1080p
90−95
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
60−65
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
130−140
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Quadro 6000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Quadro 6000.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro 6000.
high / 1080p
16−18
20−22
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 15% more, than Quadro 6000.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
90−95
100−110
medium / 1080p
45−50
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 15% more, than Quadro 6000.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
8−9
10−11
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than Quadro 6000.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
70−75
80−85
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Quadro 6000.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than Quadro 6000.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro 6000.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Quadro 6000.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than Quadro 6000.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
medium / 768p
30−35
35−40
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Quadro 6000.
low / 768p
100−105
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
Quadro 6000 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
Quadro 6000
Tesla C2070
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi
Code name
GF100
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
10 December 2010
25 July 2011
Pipelines
448
448
Core clock speed
574 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
32.14
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,027.7 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
2988 MHz
2988 MHz
Memory bandwidth
143.4 GB/s
143.4 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.0
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
91 Mh/s
Check Price
