Quadro M1200 vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M1200 and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M1200 stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
Quadro M1200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M1200 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 428% more power consumption, than Quadro M1200.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M1200.
- Quadro M1200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 417 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Quadro M1200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 2012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M1200 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Fortnite is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 13% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| Quadro M1200 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M1200 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | N17P-Q1 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 January 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 991 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1870 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |