Quadro M2000M vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between Quadro M2000M and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M2000M will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 332% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000M.
- Quadro M2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M2000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 464 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Quadro M2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 2012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 6% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| Quadro M2000M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro M2000M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M2000M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Code name | GM107 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |