Quadro M4000 vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro M4000 and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro M4000 stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
Quadro M4000
Tesla C2070
Power consumption (TDP)
120 Watt
238 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2070 has 98% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000.
Quadro M4000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M4000 has 2 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro M4000 is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 199 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Quadro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2070 is 7 mm longer, than Quadro M4000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 3020 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
9−10
QHD / 1440p
16−18
3−4
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
30−35
medium / 1080p
40−45
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p
55−60
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
35−40
6−7
4K / 2160p
18−20
5−6
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
60−65
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro M4000 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
210−220
medium / 768p
220−230
180−190
ultra / 1080p
180−190
100−110
QHD / 1440p
110−120
60−65
4K / 2160p
70−75
30−35
high / 768p
210−220
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
Quadro M4000 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p
45−50
20−22
ultra / 1080p
40−45
18−20
QHD / 1440p
27−30
18−20
4K / 2160p
14−16
6−7
low / 720p
80−85
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
27−30
12−14
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
100−110
medium / 1080p
110−120
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
30−35
10−11
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
65−70
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p
140−150
90−95
medium / 768p
120−130
80−85
high / 1080p
70−75
30−35
ultra / 1080p
30−35
12−14
QHD / 1440p
21−24
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
20−22
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2070.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2070.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
16−18
9−10
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p
130−140
60−65
medium / 768p
85−90
35−40
high / 1080p
45−50
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
4K / 2160p
16−18
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2070.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2070.
Full Specs
Quadro M4000
Tesla C2070
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Fermi
Code name
GM204
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
29 June 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
1664
448
Core clock speed
773 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
5,200 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
80.39
32.14
Floating-point performance
2,573 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
241 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
6008 MHz
2988 MHz
Memory bandwidth
143.4 GB/s
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
+
N/A
CUDA
5.2
2.0
SLI options
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
299 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Multi-display synchronization
Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6
+
Check Price
