Quadro P500 vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between Quadro P500 and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro P500 and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
Quadro P500 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P500 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P500 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro P500 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 693% more power consumption, than Quadro P500.
- Quadro P500 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro P500.
- Quadro P500 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Quadro P500 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P500 is 881 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Quadro P500 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P500 is 2024 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 49% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 74% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 116% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 86% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro P500 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | GP108 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 14 November 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1519 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.25 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.0.1 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 2.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |