Radeon 630 vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between Radeon 630 and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon 630 and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
Radeon 630 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 630 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 630 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon 630 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 376% more power consumption, than Radeon 630.
- Radeon 630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon 630.
- Radeon 630 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon 630 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Radeon 630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 630 is 3012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 218% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 89% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 266% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 142% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Radeon 630. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon 630 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Lexa | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 August 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Check Price |