Radeon Pro 450 vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Radeon Pro 450 and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro 450 and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 450 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 580% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Radeon Pro 450 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Radeon Pro 450 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 450 is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 226 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 2092 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 21% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 17% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
Radeon Pro 450 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 450 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
Code name | Polaris 11 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 27 October 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |