Radeon Pro 5600M vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon Pro 5600M and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon Pro 5600M stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
Radeon Pro 5600M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 5600M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 5600M here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro 5600M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 376% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 5600M.
- Radeon Pro 5600M is connected by PCIe 4.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 5600M has 2 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon Pro 5600M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro 5600M is build with Navi / RDNA architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by 7 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1448 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 5600M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 194% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 5600M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 230−240 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Far Cry 5 is 185% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
low / 720p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Fortnite is 152% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Grand Theft Auto V is 129% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Metro Exodus is 253% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Minecraft is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 181% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 188% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 221% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 5600M in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Tesla C2070. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro 5600M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Navi / RDNA | Fermi |
Code name | Navi 10 | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 15 June 2020 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1265 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 164.8 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1540 MBps | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |