Radeon Pro SSG vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between Radeon Pro SSG and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro SSG will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro SSG
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
- Radeon Pro SSG has 47% more power consumption, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon Pro SSG is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro SSG has 10 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro SSG is build with GCN 5.0 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro SSG is 866 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Radeon Pro SSG is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2070.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1098 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro SSG.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 205% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Battlefield 5 is 228% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro SSG. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 230−240 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Far Cry 5 is 204% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 100−105 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 21−24 | − |
low / 720p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Fortnite is 165% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | − |
low / 720p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Forza Horizon 4 is 206% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Metro Exodus is 284% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Minecraft is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 206% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 222% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 246% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro SSG in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Tesla C2070. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro SSG | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Vega 10 | GF100 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 8 August 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | 248 mm |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Similar compares
- Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Radeon Pro SSG vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Tesla C2070 vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 590
- Radeon Pro SSG vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost