Radeon R7 A360 vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between Radeon R7 A360 and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 A360 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A360
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 A360 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
- Radeon R7 A360 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 5 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Radeon R7 A360 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 151 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon R7 A360 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 2985 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R7 A360 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 489% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R7 A360 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 377% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 A360 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Meso | GF100 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 May 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,550 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.52 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3.6 GB/s | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |