Radeon R9 M295X vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between Radeon R9 M295X and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R9 M295X and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
Radeon R9 M295X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M295X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M295X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M295X | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | Not Listed | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M295X has 5% more power consumption, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon R9 M295X is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M295X is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M295X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M295X is 149 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M295X and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R9 M295X and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Fortnite is 89% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M295X in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M295X | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Fermi |
| Code name | Tonga | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | Not Listed | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 392 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |