Radeon R9 M365X vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M365X and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M365X will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
Radeon R9 M365X | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M365X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M365X.
- Radeon R9 M365X is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M365X is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 326 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon R9 M365X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1863 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 122% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 144% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 90% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 115% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. |
Full Specs
Radeon R9 M365X | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
Code name | Tropo | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 6 May 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,184 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Iris Graphics 6100
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870
- Tesla C2070 vs Iris Graphics 6100
- Tesla C2070 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870
- Radeon R9 M365X vs GeForce GTX 590
- Radeon R9 M365X vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost