Radeon R9 M370X vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon R9 M370X and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon R9 M370X stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M370X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M370X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M370X here:
Main Specs
Radeon R9 M370X | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M370X.
- Radeon R9 M370X is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M370X is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M370X is 226 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon R9 M370X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M370X is 1512 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 218% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 266% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 119% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M370X. |
Full Specs
Radeon R9 M370X | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Cape Verde | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 19 May 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1500 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 11_1), Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 125 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |