Radeon R9 M390X vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M390X | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 138% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Radeon R9 M390X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Radeon R9 M390X is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M390X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M390X is 149 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon R9 M390X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Fortnite is 28% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Metro Exodus is 38% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 35% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M390X | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Fermi |
| Code name | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 9 June 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |