Radeon R9 M395 vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Radeon R9 M395 and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R9 M395 and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
Radeon R9 M395 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M395 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395.
- Radeon R9 M395 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M395 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395 is 260 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1738 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M395 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R9 M395 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M395 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | GF100 | |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 9 June 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 834 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5000 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |