Radeon RX 460 mobile vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
| Radeon RX 460 mobile | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 332% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Radeon RX 460 mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 3012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon RX 460 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon RX 460 mobile | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
| Code name | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 8 August 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.08 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,115 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |