Radeon RX 560 mobile vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between Radeon RX 560 mobile and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon RX 560 mobile and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
Radeon RX 560 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 560 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 560 mobile here:
Main Specs
Radeon RX 560 mobile | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 332% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 560 mobile.
- Radeon RX 560 mobile is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 560 mobile.
- Radeon RX 560 mobile is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX 560 mobile is build with Polaris architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560 mobile is 601 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon RX 560 mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560 mobile is 3012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
Radeon RX 560 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Fortnite is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
Radeon RX 560 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon RX 560 mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
Radeon RX 560 mobile | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Polaris | Fermi |
Code name | Polaris 11 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 January 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1275 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 58.97 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,462 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon RX 560 mobile vs Quadro P2000 Max Q
- Radeon RX 560 mobile vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Tesla C2070 vs Quadro P2000 Max Q
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Radeon RX 560 mobile vs GeForce GTX 590
- Radeon RX 560 mobile vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost