Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:
Main Specs
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is build with Vega architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 81% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 84% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 49% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 63% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 85% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. |
Full Specs
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Vega | Fermi |
Code name | Vega Raven Ridge | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 26 October 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 512 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce MX150
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GRID K280Q
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce MX150
- Tesla C2070 vs GRID K280Q
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost