Radeon RX Vega M GL vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Radeon RX Vega M GL and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon RX Vega M GL and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
Radeon RX Vega M GL | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 266% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is connected by IGP, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is build with GCN 4.0 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 357 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1588 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
Radeon RX Vega M GL and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
Radeon RX Vega M GL and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon RX Vega M GL and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
Radeon RX Vega M GL | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Polaris 22 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 February 2018 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Check Price |