Tesla C2070 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Tesla C2070 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Tesla C2070 stacks up against Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Tesla C2070 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- Tesla C2070 is build with Fermi architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Tesla C2070 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 21% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Tesla C2070 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 15% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. |
Full Specs
Tesla C2070 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GF100 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 25 July 2011 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 448 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tesla C2070 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100