FirePro M4100 vs Tesla C2075
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4100 and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4100 stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.
FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4100
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro M4100.
FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 96 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro M4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M4100 is 868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
4−5
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
55−60
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
95−100
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
18−20
30−35
high / 768p
65−70
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 106% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
85−90
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
100−110
ultra / 1080p
24−27
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 90% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 200% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
4−5
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
7−8
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 310% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
5−6
30−35
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
5−6
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro M4100.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
12−14
60−65
medium / 768p
9−10
35−40
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 371% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than FirePro M4100.
Full Specs
FirePro M4100
Tesla C2075
Architecture
GCN
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Mars
GF110
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 October 2013
25 July 2011
Pipelines
384
448
Core clock speed
670 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
16.08
32.14
Floating-point performance
514.6 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
74 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
