FirePro M5950 vs Tesla C2075
When choosing between FirePro M5950 and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5950 and Tesla C2075.
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 605% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 151 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro M5950 and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 2232 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
20−22
55−60
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 218% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
95−100
190−200
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
27−30
65−70
4K / 2160p
18−20
30−35
high / 768p
70−75
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−33
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 83% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
5−6
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
2−3
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
7−8
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
18−20
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 140% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
9−10
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−11
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
80−85
high / 1080p
8−9
30−35
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
1−2
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
9−10
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
ultra / 1080p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than FirePro M5950.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
9−10
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
20−22
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
4K / 2160p
2−3
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 44% more, than FirePro M5950.
Full Specs
FirePro M5950
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Terascale 2
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Whistler-XT
GF110
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
13 April 2011
25 July 2011
Pipelines
480
448
Core clock speed
725 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
17.40
32.14
Floating-point performance
696.0 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
67 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Form factor
MXM-A
Check Price
Check Price
