FirePro S7000 vs Tesla C2075
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and Tesla C2075.
FirePro S7000
Main Specs
FirePro S7000
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
350 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
FirePro S7000 has 41% more power consumption, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 376 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
FirePro S7000 is 44 mm longer, than Tesla C2075.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 1668 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
QHD / 1440p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
6−7
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
low / 720p
70−75
55−60
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro S7000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
210−220
medium / 768p
200−210
190−200
ultra / 1080p
120−130
100−110
QHD / 1440p
95−100
65−70
4K / 2160p
50−55
30−35
high / 768p
170−180
150−160
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
80−85
70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
QHD / 1440p
20−22
18−20
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
low / 720p
55−60
45−50
medium / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
75−80
60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 14% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
35−40
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
14−16
10−11
4K / 2160p
14−16
−
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
95−100
80−85
high / 1080p
40−45
30−35
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
QHD / 1440p
8−9
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−12
ultra / 1080p
10−12
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
1−2
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 38% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
75−80
60−65
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
4K / 2160p
9−10
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
FirePro S7000
Tesla C2075
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Pitcairn
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
27 August 2012
25 July 2011
Pipelines
1280
448
Core clock speed
950 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
76.00
32.14
Floating-point performance
2,432 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
292 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
4800 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
153.6 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
272 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Form factor
full height / full length
DisplayPort count
1
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
