FirePro S7150 vs Tesla C2075

When comparing FirePro S7150 and Tesla C2075, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7150 and Tesla C2075 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro S7150

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S7150	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI
		Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 64% more power consumption, than FirePro S7150.
FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro S7150 has 2 GB more memory, than Tesla C2075.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 346 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 7 mm longer, than FirePro S7150.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	16−18
ultra / 1080p	21−24	10−11
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	35−40
medium / 1080p	40−45	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	55−60	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	35−40	6−7
4K / 2160p	18−20	6−7
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S7150 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	210−220
medium / 768p	220−230	190−200
ultra / 1080p	180−190	100−110
QHD / 1440p	110−120	65−70
4K / 2160p	70−75	30−35
high / 768p	210−220	150−160
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro S7150 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
QHD / 1440p	27−30	18−20
4K / 2160p	14−16	6−7
low / 720p	80−85	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	27−30	14−16
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	30−35	10−11
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	65−70	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 103% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	140−150	90−95
medium / 768p	120−130	80−85
high / 1080p	70−75	30−35
ultra / 1080p	30−35	14−16
QHD / 1440p	21−24	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−12
ultra / 1080p	20−22	8−9
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	30−35
medium / 1080p	30−35	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	130−140	110−120
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	9−10
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	30−35
medium / 1080p	35−40	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	130−140	60−65
medium / 768p	85−90	35−40
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	24−27	12−14
4K / 2160p	16−18	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2075.

Full Specs

	FirePro S7150	Tesla C2075
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Tonga	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 February 2016	25 July 2011
Pipelines	2048	448
Core clock speed	920 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	5,000 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	117.8	32.14
Floating-point performance	3,763 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	241 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s
		Check Price

FirePro S7150 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares