FirePro S9000 vs Tesla C2075

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9000 and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9000 stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.

FirePro S9000

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S9000	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	1x DVI
		Check Price

FirePro S9000 has 41% more power consumption, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro S9000 and Tesla C2075 have maximum RAM of 6 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 326 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
FirePro S9000 is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2075.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 2368 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	16−18
ultra / 1080p	21−24	10−11
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	35−40
medium / 1080p	40−45	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	55−60	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	35−40	6−7
4K / 2160p	18−20	6−7
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S9000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	210−220
medium / 768p	220−230	190−200
ultra / 1080p	180−190	100−110
QHD / 1440p	110−120	65−70
4K / 2160p	70−75	30−35
high / 768p	210−220	150−160
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro S9000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
QHD / 1440p	27−30	18−20
4K / 2160p	14−16	6−7
low / 720p	80−85	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	27−30	14−16
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	30−35	10−11
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	65−70	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 103% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	140−150	90−95
medium / 768p	120−130	80−85
high / 1080p	70−75	30−35
ultra / 1080p	30−35	14−16
QHD / 1440p	21−24	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−12
ultra / 1080p	20−22	8−9
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	30−35
medium / 1080p	30−35	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	130−140	110−120
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	9−10
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	30−35
medium / 1080p	35−40	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	130−140	60−65
medium / 768p	85−90	35−40
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	24−27	12−14
4K / 2160p	16−18	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2075.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9000	Tesla C2075
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Tahiti	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 August 2012	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1792	448
Core clock speed	900 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	32.14
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	267 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	92 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+
		Check Price

FirePro S9000 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares