FirePro V4900 vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between FirePro V4900 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V4900 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 229% more power consumption, than FirePro V4900.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 226 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro V4900 and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 85 mm longer, than FirePro V4900.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 320% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
55−60
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 337% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
110−120
210−220
medium / 768p
90−95
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
65−70
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
100−110
ultra / 1080p
24−27
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
3−4
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
4−5
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 360% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 182% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 287% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
80−85
high / 1080p
6−7
30−35
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
5−6
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
60−65
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
12−14
60−65
medium / 768p
10−11
35−40
high / 1080p
5−6
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
2−3
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FirePro V4900.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
Tesla C2075
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Turks
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 November 2011
25 July 2011
Pipelines
480
448
Core clock speed
800 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
32.14
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
163 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
