FirePro W600 vs Tesla C2075

When choosing between FirePro W600 and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W600 and Tesla C2075.

FirePro W600 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W600	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	6x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 229% more power consumption, than FirePro W600.
FirePro W600 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro W600.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W600 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro W600 is 176 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro W600 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 85 mm longer, than FirePro W600.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W600 is 868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	8−9	16−18
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−11	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 110% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	14−16	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 105% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	150−160	210−220
medium / 768p	120−130	190−200
ultra / 1080p	60−65	100−110
QHD / 1440p	30−35	65−70
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−35
high / 768p	90−95	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
medium / 768p	65−70	100−110
ultra / 1080p	35−40	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 51% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	10−11	21−24
ultra / 1080p	9−10	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	4−5	6−7
low / 720p	21−24	45−50
medium / 1080p	10−11	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 109% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	16−18	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	110−120
medium / 1080p	27−30	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 83% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	14−16	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	2−3	10−11
low / 720p	30−35	60−65
medium / 1080p	16−18	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 93% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	55−60	90−95
medium / 768p	50−55	80−85
high / 1080p	14−16	30−35
ultra / 1080p	7−8	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	5−6	10−12
ultra / 1080p	4−5	8−9
4K / 2160p	1−2	1−2
low / 720p	14−16	30−35
medium / 1080p	7−8	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 116% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	85−90	−
medium / 1080p	95−100	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 18% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	35−40	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	30−35
medium / 1080p	12−14	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	30−33	60−65
medium / 768p	18−20	35−40
high / 1080p	10−12	21−24
ultra / 1080p	7−8	12−14
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 86% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	21−24	35−40
high / 768p	40−45	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than FirePro W600.

Full Specs

	FirePro W600	Tesla C2075
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Cape Verde	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	13 June 2012	25 July 2011
Pipelines	512	448
Core clock speed	750 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	24.00	32.14
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	163 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	94 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W600 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares