FirePro W7170M vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between FirePro W7170M and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7170M will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 147% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W7170M.
FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 149 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
10−12
6−7
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
low / 720p
65−70
55−60
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W7170M and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
210−220
medium / 768p
200−210
190−200
ultra / 1080p
110−120
100−110
QHD / 1440p
85−90
65−70
4K / 2160p
45−50
30−35
high / 768p
160−170
150−160
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
75−80
70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
70−75
60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 12% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
10−11
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
60−65
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
90−95
80−85
high / 1080p
40−45
30−35
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−12
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 23% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M
Tesla C2075
Architecture
GCN 3
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Tonga
GF110
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
2048
448
Core clock speed
723 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
5,000 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
92.54
32.14
Floating-point performance
2,961 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.3
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Eyefinity
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price
