FirePro W8000 vs Tesla C2075

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W8000 and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W8000 stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.

FirePro W8000 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W8000	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 9% more power consumption, than FirePro W8000.
FirePro W8000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W8000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W8000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro W8000 is 326 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro W8000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
FirePro W8000 is 31 mm longer, than Tesla C2075.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W8000 is 2368 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−11	10−11
QHD / 1440p	4−5	4−5
low / 720p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	21−24	21−24
FirePro W8000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p	27−30	27−30
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
QHD / 1440p	7−8	6−7
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	60−65	55−60
medium / 1080p	30−35	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W8000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	220−230	210−220
medium / 768p	190−200	190−200
ultra / 1080p	100−110	100−110
QHD / 1440p	65−70	65−70
4K / 2160p	35−40	30−35
high / 768p	150−160	150−160
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	45−50	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro W8000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	70−75	70−75
FirePro W8000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
QHD / 1440p	18−20	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	45−50	45−50
medium / 1080p	21−24	21−24
FirePro W8000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5.
high / 1080p	27−30	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
QHD / 1440p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	110−120	110−120
medium / 1080p	60−65	60−65
FirePro W8000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p	30−33	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	21−24
QHD / 1440p	10−12	10−11
low / 720p	60−65	60−65
medium / 1080p	30−35	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	85−90	80−85
high / 1080p	35−40	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
QHD / 1440p	4−5	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	10−12	10−12
ultra / 1080p	8−9	8−9
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	14−16	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
FirePro W8000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
FirePro W8000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
medium / 768p	40−45	35−40
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
FirePro W8000 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

	FirePro W8000	Tesla C2075
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Tahiti	GF110
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	14 June 2012	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1792	448
Core clock speed	900 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	32.14
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	279 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	176 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	391 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W8000 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares