FireStream 9370 vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
Main Specs
FireStream 9370
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 9% more power consumption, than FireStream 9370.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 251 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FireStream 9370 and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
FireStream 9370 is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2075.
Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 1468 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
45−50
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p
190−200
210−220
medium / 768p
160−170
190−200
ultra / 1080p
85−90
100−110
QHD / 1440p
45−50
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
120−130
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
85−90
100−110
ultra / 1080p
55−60
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 35% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
85−90
110−120
medium / 1080p
45−50
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 26% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
7−8
10−11
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
65−70
80−85
high / 1080p
24−27
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p
8−9
10−12
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
95−100
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 9% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p
45−50
60−65
medium / 768p
27−30
35−40
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FireStream 9370.
Full Specs
FireStream 9370
Tesla C2075
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Cypress
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
23 June 2010
25 July 2011
Pipelines
1600
448
Core clock speed
825 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
2,154 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
66.00
32.14
Floating-point performance
2,640.0 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
267 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
4600 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
147.2 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
