GeForce GT 440 vs Tesla C2075

In this comparison between GeForce GT 440 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 440 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GT 440 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GT 440	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 280% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 440.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GT 440 has 506 GB more memory, than Tesla C2075.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GT 440 is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GT 440 is 1046 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GT 440 and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 243 mm longer, than GeForce GT 440.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1532 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 440.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GT 440.
low / 768p	60−65	210−220
medium / 768p	27−30	190−200
ultra / 1080p	7−8	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	65−70
4K / 2160p	−	30−35
high / 768p	16−18	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 496% more, than GeForce GT 440.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
GeForce GT 440 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
low / 768p	18−20	90−95
medium / 768p	−	80−85
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GT 440.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than GeForce GT 440.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	60−65
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GT 440.

Full Specs

	GeForce GT 440	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Fermi	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GF108	GF110
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	1 February 2011	25 July 2011
Pipelines	96	448
Core clock speed	1620 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	585 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	13.0 billion/sec	32.14
Floating-point performance	311.04 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth		150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	2.0
CUDA cores	96
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	20 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
Standard memory config per GPU	1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GT 440 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares