GeForce GTS 360M vs Tesla C2075

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTS 360M and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTS 360M stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.

GeForce GTS 360M Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:

GeForce GTS 360M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTS 360M	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	38 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 550% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 862 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTS 360M and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
low / 768p	60−65	210−220
medium / 768p	27−30	190−200
ultra / 1080p	7−8	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	65−70
4K / 2160p	−	30−35
high / 768p	16−18	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 496% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
GeForce GTS 360M and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
low / 768p	18−20	90−95
medium / 768p	−	80−85
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	60−65
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTS 360M	Tesla C2075
Architecture	GT2xx	Fermi 2.0
Code name	N11E-GS1	GF110
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	7 January 2010	25 July 2011
Pipelines	96	448
Core clock speed	1436 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	727 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	17.60	32.14
Floating-point performance	275.71 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed		3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57.6 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	2.0
CUDA cores	96
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options	+
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s
Laptop size	large
Gigaflops	413
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 360M vs Tesla C2075

GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares