GeForce GTX 560 vs Tesla C2075

When choosing between GeForce GTX 560 and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 560 and Tesla C2075.

GeForce GTX 560 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 560	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 64% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 560.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 560 and Tesla C2075 are build with Fermi 2.0 architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560 is 236 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 560 and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 240 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 560.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 560 is 868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	3−4	4−5
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 560.
high / 1080p	21−24	27−30
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	5−6	6−7
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	45−50	55−60
medium / 1080p	24−27	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 560.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560.
low / 768p	200−210	210−220
medium / 768p	170−180	190−200
ultra / 1080p	90−95	100−110
QHD / 1440p	50−55	65−70
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−35
high / 768p	130−140	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 560.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 560.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
medium / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	60−65	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 560.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	16−18	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 560.
high / 1080p	21−24	27−30
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	90−95	110−120
medium / 1080p	45−50	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 560.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	8−9	10−11
low / 720p	45−50	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 560.
low / 768p	80−85	90−95
medium / 768p	70−75	80−85
high / 1080p	27−30	30−35
ultra / 1080p	10−12	14−16
QHD / 1440p	2−3	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 560.
high / 1080p	9−10	10−12
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 560.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 560.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 560.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	30−35
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 560.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
medium / 768p	30−35	35−40
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−11	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 560.
low / 768p	100−105	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
GeForce GTX 560 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 560	Tesla C2075
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GF114	GF110
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	17 May 2011	25 July 2011
Pipelines	336	448
Core clock speed	810 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	1,950 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	45.36	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,088.6 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	8.25" (21 cm)	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	2.0
Bus support	16x PCI-E 2.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	+
HDMI	+
HDCP	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
3D Blu-Ray	+
3D Gaming	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	80 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 560 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares