GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 560 Ti will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
170 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 45% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560 Ti is 248 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 19 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1128 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
8−9
6−7
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p
210−220
210−220
medium / 768p
180−190
190−200
ultra / 1080p
100−110
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−35
30−35
high / 768p
140−150
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
95−100
100−110
ultra / 1080p
65−70
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
QHD / 1440p
16−18
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
20−22
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
110−120
medium / 1080p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
9−10
10−11
4K / 2160p
9−10
−
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
75−80
80−85
high / 1080p
30−35
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−12
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
4K / 2160p
3−4
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
GeForce GTX 560 Ti and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 560 Ti.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 560 Ti in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GF114
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
25 January 2011
25 July 2011
Pipelines
384
448
Core clock speed
822 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
52.67
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,263.4 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
229 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
2004 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
128.3 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.1
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
87 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred)
0.39 Gh/s
Check Price
Check Price
