GeForce GTX 560M vs Tesla C2075
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 560M stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 560M
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 229% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M.
GeForce GTX 560M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 560M has 1530 GB more memory, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 560M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 560M is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 201 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1882 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
130−140
210−220
medium / 768p
100−110
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
12−14
30−35
high / 768p
75−80
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 187% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
18−20
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 173% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
50−55
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
10−12
30−35
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
medium / 720p
45−50
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
1−2
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
10−11
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 146% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
20−22
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 560M
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi 2.0
Code name
N12E-GS
GF110
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
30 May 2011
25 July 2011
Pipelines
192
448
Core clock speed
775 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
24.8 billion/sec
32.14
Floating-point performance
595.2 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1250 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
2.0
CUDA cores
192
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
44 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
