GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Tesla C2075
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 84% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 406 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 239 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 3126 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
6−7
6−7
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
55−60
55−60
medium / 1080p
30−33
30−35
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
210−220
210−220
medium / 768p
180−190
190−200
ultra / 1080p
100−110
100−110
QHD / 1440p
60−65
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−35
30−35
high / 768p
150−160
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
70−75
70−75
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
18−20
18−20
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
110−120
medium / 1080p
60−65
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
10−11
10−11
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
80−85
80−85
high / 1080p
30−35
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−12
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
high / 1080p
21−24
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GK106
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
25 July 2011
Pipelines
768
448
Core clock speed
980 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
248 mm
Memory bus width
192 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
2.0
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price