GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Tesla C2075

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 247 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 1x DVI
  Check Price Check Price
  • Tesla C2075 has 84% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
  • GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
  • Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 406 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
  • GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
  • Tesla C2075 is 239 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
  • Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 3126 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 16−18 16−18
ultra / 1080p 9−10 10−11
QHD / 1440p 3−4 4−5
low / 720p 30−35 35−40
medium / 1080p 21−24 21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost Tesla C2075
Architecture Kepler Fermi 2.0
Code name GK106 GF110
Type Desktop Workstation
Release date 26 March 2013 25 July 2011
Pipelines 768 448
Core clock speed 980 MHz 574 MHz
Boost Clock 1033 MHz
Transistor count 2,540 million 3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Texture fill rate 62.7 billion/sec 32.14
Floating-point performance 1,585 gflops 1,030.4 gflops
Length 9.5" (24.1 cm) 248 mm
Memory bus width 192 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 6.0 GB/s 3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth 144.2 GB/s 150.3 GB/s
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.3 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.1
Vulkan 1.1.126 N/A
CUDA + 2.0
CUDA cores 768
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options +
Multi monitor support 4 Displays
HDMI +
HDCP +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI Internal
3D Blu-Ray +
3D Gaming +
3D Vision +
3D Vision Live +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 54 Mh/s 94 Mh/s
  Check Price Check Price