GeForce GTX 660M vs Tesla C2075
When choosing between GeForce GTX 660M and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 660M and Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 660M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 660M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 660M
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 394% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 660M.
GeForce GTX 660M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 660M.
GeForce GTX 660M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 660M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 261 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1132 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
130−140
210−220
medium / 768p
110−120
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
100−110
QHD / 1440p
27−30
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
80−85
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
110−120
medium / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−11
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 138% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
50−55
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
80−85
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
4−5
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
6−7
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
24−27
60−65
medium / 768p
16−18
35−40
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 115% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 660M
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Code name
N13E-GE
GF110
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
22 March 2012
25 July 2011
Pipelines
384
448
Core clock speed
835 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
30.4 billion/sec
32.14
Floating-point performance
729.6 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
128bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.0 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
2.0
CUDA cores
384
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
36 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
