GeForce GTX 670 vs Tesla C2075
When choosing between GeForce GTX 670 and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 670 and Tesla C2075.
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
170 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 45% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670.
GeForce GTX 670 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 670 is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670 is 406 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 670 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 239 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 670.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 3126 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−11
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
35−40
medium / 1080p
40−45
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
55−60
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
35−40
6−7
4K / 2160p
18−20
6−7
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
60−65
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 670 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
210−220
medium / 768p
220−230
190−200
ultra / 1080p
180−190
100−110
QHD / 1440p
110−120
65−70
4K / 2160p
70−75
30−35
high / 768p
210−220
150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 670 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
45−50
21−24
ultra / 1080p
40−45
18−20
QHD / 1440p
27−30
18−20
4K / 2160p
14−16
6−7
low / 720p
80−85
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
27−30
14−16
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
30−35
10−11
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
65−70
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Forza Horizon 4 is 103% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
140−150
90−95
medium / 768p
120−130
80−85
high / 1080p
70−75
30−35
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
QHD / 1440p
21−24
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−12
ultra / 1080p
20−22
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
9−10
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
130−140
60−65
medium / 768p
85−90
35−40
high / 1080p
45−50
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
4K / 2160p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GK104
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
10 May 2012
25 July 2011
Pipelines
1344
448
Core clock speed
980 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
102.5 billion/sec
32.14
Floating-point performance
2,459.5 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
248 mm
Memory bus width
256-bit GDDR5
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
2.0
CUDA cores
1344
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
97 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
13 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price