GeForce GTX 670MX vs Tesla C2075
When comparing GeForce GTX 670MX and Tesla C2075, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 670MX and Tesla C2075 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 670MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 229% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
GeForce GTX 670MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
GeForce GTX 670MX is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 670MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670MX is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTX 670MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1732 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
55−60
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
150−160
210−220
medium / 768p
130−140
190−200
ultra / 1080p
65−70
100−110
QHD / 1440p
35−40
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
95−100
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
65−70
100−110
ultra / 1080p
40−45
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−12
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
110−120
medium / 1080p
30−33
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
10−11
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 93% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
60−65
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
80−85
high / 1080p
16−18
30−35
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
30−35
60−65
medium / 768p
21−24
35−40
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
35−40
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Code name
N13E-GR
GF110
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
1 October 2012
25 July 2011
Pipelines
960
448
Core clock speed
600 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
48.0 billion/sec
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,154 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
192 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1400 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
67.2 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
2.0
CUDA cores
960
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
